제주대학교 Repository

한국과 중국의 원산지 규정에 관한 비교연구

Metadata Downloads
Alternative Title
The Comparative Study on the Rules of Origin in Korea and China
Abstract
Since the 21st century, the trade agreements and regional trade agreements are spread widely and actively. Chinese government is beginning to pay close attention to FTA, especially in 2003, Chinese government formed FTA entente with other four countries, which leads to the rapid growth in trade scale of China.
China and Korea play an important role in the economic development of Asia, but the economic cooperation between China and Korea are not as compact as the European community. Now the government and academia of China and Korea are putting up various studies and discussions regarding the possibility of FTA between China and Korea.
Rules of Origin are an important part of FTA, which can affect the interests of FTA. And with the extension of FTA system, for the products which have tariff preferences, the problem about 'how to judge with a certain criteria' has become an important issue.
At present, most of the studies in domestic of China are focused on the global origin, and the studies about FTA between China and Korea are mainly about the economic structures and the effects on the development of economic after forming FTA. This thesis is a disquisition which analyzes and studies the rules of origin about FTA forming between China and Korea based on the technical comparison regarding the rules of origin.
Specifically, this thesis was composed of six chapters.
The first chapter was the introduction part, which was mainly about the background, motivation and method of research and the structure of this thesis.
The rules of origin's summarization, the necessity and significance for unifying the rules of origin of WTO, and the primary benchmark for the determination of origin was introduced in Chapter 2.
In the third chapter, at first the legal system regarding rules of origin of China and Korea was analyzed, the characters of the two countries' rules of origin were introduced. Then the rules of origin in Korea were analyzed based on the denotation method, determination benchmark, procedure of confirming and other aspects.
In Chapter 4, the rules of origin of China and Korea were analyzed and compared centered around five industries namely fiber industry, steel industry, automobile industry, machinery industry and electronic industry.
China's rules of origin were analyzed in Chapter 5, some of the problems regarding denotation method, benchmark of determination and confirmation procedure of origin were pointed out and scenarios to improve the pointed out problems were proposed.
Chapter 6 summarizes the main contents of this thesis, and the conclusion were briefly described.
Author(s)
서영초
Issued Date
2011
Awarded Date
2011. 8
Type
Dissertation
URI
http://dcoll.jejunu.ac.kr/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000005549
Alternative Author(s)
Xu, Ying-Chao
Affiliation
제주대학교
Department
대학원 무역학과
Advisor
황정봉
Table Of Contents
Ⅰ. 序 論 1
1. 研究의 背景 및 目的 1
2. 研究의 方法 및 構成 3
Ⅱ. 原產地規定에 관한 一般的 基準 4
1. 原產地規定의 概要 4
1) 원산지규정의 개념 및 구성요소 4
2) 원산지의 분류 및 적용분야 6
3) 원산지규정의 중요성 7
2. WTO 統一原產地規定 9
1) WTO 통일원산지규정의 의의 9
2) WTO 통일원산지규정의 필요성 10
3) WTO 통일원산지규정의 일반원칙 11
3. 原產地의 主要 判定基準 12
1) 원산지의 일반적 판정기준 12
2) FTA에서의 원산지 결정기준 23
Ⅲ. 韓國과 中國 原產地規定의 比較分析 27
1. 韓國의 原產地規定 27
1) 한국의 원산지규정 관련 법률체계 27
2) 한국의 원산지규정의 특징 30
2. 中國의 原產地規定 37
1) 중국의 원산지규정 관련 법률체계 37
2) 중국의 원산지규정의 특징 48
3. 韓國과 中國의 原產地制度 比較 55
1) 원산지 관련 규정의 비교 55
2) 원산지 표시방법의 비교 57
3) 원산지 판정기준의 비교 58
4) 원산지 확인절차의 비교 59
5) 원산지규정 위반 벌칙의 비교 60
Ⅳ. 韓國과 中國의 主要產業의 原產地規定 比較 62
1. 섬유산업 원산지규정 비교 62
2. 철강산업 원산지규정 비교 67
3. 자동차산업 원산지규정 비교 69
4. 일반기계산업 원산지규정 비교 72
5. 전기전자산업 원산지규정비교 77
Ⅴ. 中國의 原產地規定 問題點과 改善方案 82
1. 중국 원산지규정의 현황 82
2. 중국 원산지 표시방법의 문제점 및 개선방안 84
3. 중국 원산지 판정기준의 문제점 및 개선방안 84
4. 중국 원산지 확인절차의 문제점 및 개선방안 86
Ⅵ. 結論 89
참 고 문 헌 91
ABSTRACT 95
Degree
Master
Publisher
제주대학교 대학원
Citation
서영초. (2011). 한국과 중국의 원산지 규정에 관한 비교연구
Appears in Collections:
General Graduate School > International Trade
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
파일 목록

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.