제주대학교 Repository

한·중·일간 무역경쟁력 비교 분석

Metadata Downloads
Alternative Title
Analysis of the Export and Import Competitiveness between Korea, China and Japan
Abstract
In this study, three countries trading status with China, Japan China and Japan trade between nations of the two structures, Construction, and after reviewing the structural features, trade-specific index, Revealed Comparative Advantage Index, the market index, using comparative three countries China, Japan and major industrial competitiveness World and United States national, as well as partners in the market is competitive and comparative analysis. The results are summarized can be summarized as follows.
First, China and Japan 3 interoffice trade structure can be summarized as follows.
Daesegye three countries in 2010 compared to total exports, China 1 trillion 2000 billion (the world's No. 1, 11.1% share in world exports), Japan, 5,800 billion (4th place, copper 5.3%), South Korea 3,600 billion (World 9 above, copper 3.3%), respectively, to record levels in China and Japan and South Korea's 3.3 times the level that is 1.6 times that of Korea. The number of one trillion U.S. dollars in China (the world's No.2, copper 9.1%), Japan 5,500 billion(5th, East 5%), South Korea 3,200 billion (the world's No.9, East 2.9%) and China each recorded 3.1 times that of South Korea level and 1.7 times the level in South Korea is Japan.
South Korea exported a total of Electrical and Electronics Engineers is a non-species list with the highest proportion of 23%, followed by transport equipment 21%, 11% machinery, iron and steel metal products 10%, China Electronics with 23% in the highest proportion, followed by machinery, 20%, textiles 13%, and steel metal products 10%, Japan, the transport unit with the highest proportion of 25%, followed by machinery, 19% of 18% of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Electrical and electronics, transport equipment, machinery, including exports of items 3 to 62% of the total is higher than South Korea and China.
China, Korea and Japan for the trade deficit and trade deficit against South Korea, Japan and the three interoffice vision to the fact that the trade structure can be found.
Second, the trade specialization index (TSI), Revealed Comparative Advantage index (RCA) using the three countries China, Japan and daemiguk daesegye, and the three countries on bilateral industrial competitiveness summarizes changes results are as follows.
3 interoffice compared with the TSI index, China, Japan and South Korea compared to the plastic or rubber and leather goods, electronics, precision instruments, but it seems a relatively low competitiveness, textile, non-metallic minerals, iron and steel metal products appear in the comparative advantage has been observed that stronger competitive. The technological gap between nations of these three have been reduced, the future competitiveness of Chinese industries in Japan and Korea can view higher than that.
China's textile industry is labor intensive, non-metallic minerals that have a highly competitive compared to Japan, while Japan's industry is capital intensive machinery, electronics, transportation equipment, precision instruments as the relatively low compared to Japan can be Japanese industry is still more than the Chinese industry has the technical advantage that can be interpreted. In addition, China's textile industry is labor intensive, non-metallic mineral, metal products and steel industry is capital intensive and highly competitive than South Korea shows, trade between Korea and China over trade jungilgan technology means that the gap is smaller.
RCA index three countries in the world market through steel metal products, electronics, precision instruments to maintain a high market share led to intense competition, while agriculture, forestry and fisheries, mining, chemical products, timber and pulp showed that the weak competitiveness. If the transport equipment industry in China, Korea and Japan is lower than the share of textiles, nonmetallic minerals, and other manufacturers in the world market share, higher than South Korea and Japan as a strong competitive edge was observed.
Author(s)
왕산
Issued Date
2011
Awarded Date
2012. 2
Type
Dissertation
URI
http://dcoll.jejunu.ac.kr/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000005765
Alternative Author(s)
Wang Shan
Affiliation
제주대학교
Department
대학원 무역학과
Advisor
김영춘
Table Of Contents
Ⅰ. 서론 1
1. 연구 목적 1
2. 연구 범위 2
3. 연구 방법 2
Ⅱ. 선행 연구 5
Ⅲ. 한·중·일의 무역 현황 9
1. 한국의 무역 현황 9
2. 중국의 무역 현황 12
3. 일본의 무역 현황 15
Ⅳ. 한·중·일 3국간 무역의 발전 과정 및 무역 구조 변화 19
1. 한·중 무역의 발전 과정 및 무역 구조 변화 19
1) 한·중 무역의 발전 과정 19
2) 한·중 상호간 무역의 교역 현황 22
3) 한국 대 중국 품목별 수출 25
4) 한국 대 중국 품목별 수입 26
2. 한·일 무역의 발전 과정 및 무역 구조 변화 27
1) 한·일 무역의 발전 과정 27
2) 한·일 상호간 무역의 교역 현황 29
3) 한국 대 일본 품목별 수출 31
4) 한국 대 일본 품목별 수입 32
3. 중·일 무역의 발전 과정 및 무역 구조 변화 34
1) 중·일 무역의 발전 과정 34
2) 중·일 상호간 무역의 교역 현황 35
3) 중국 대 일본 품목별 수출 36
4) 중국 대 일본 품목별 수입 37
4. 한·중·일 3국 무역 구조의 변화 38
1) 한국의 무역 구조의 변화 추이 38
2) 중국의 무역 구조의 변화 추이 39
3) 일본의 무역 구조의 변화 추이 40
4) 한·중·일 주요 수출국 비중 비교 41
Ⅴ. 한·중·일 3국간 무역경쟁력 비교 분석 44
1. 한·중·일의 RCA지수 비교 분석 44
1) 현시비교우위지수 44
2) 실증분석 47
2. 한·중·일 3국의 TSI지수 비교 분석 51
1) 무역특화지수 51
2) 한·중·일 3국의 대 세계 수출입 비교 52
3) 미국시장에서의 한·중·일 3국의 품목별 무역경쟁력 비교 56
3. 한·중·일간 무역경쟁력 비교 분석 59
1) 한·중 경쟁력 비교 59
2) 한·일 경쟁력 비교 61
3) 중·일 경쟁력 비교 64
Ⅵ. 결론 68
참고 문헌 72
부록 76
ABSTRACT 80
Degree
Master
Publisher
제주대학교 대학원
Citation
왕산. (2011). 한·중·일간 무역경쟁력 비교 분석
Appears in Collections:
General Graduate School > International Trade
Authorize & License
  • AuthorizeOpen
Files in This Item:

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.