제주대학교 Repository

소비자계약상의 정보제공의무에 관한 연구

Metadata Downloads
Alternative Title
A Research on Obligatory Information Provision regarding Consumer Contracts
Abstract
This study is based on the thesis that there is an information gap between businessmen and consumers when consumer contracts take place, and accordingly businessmen should be held responsible with the obligation of the provision of information toward consumers, and when a businessman violates the obligation, he or she should be responsible for every aspect, and this study considers our legal system comparing it with the legislation cases of major developed nations.
The analyzed subjects in this study are eight domestic laws, including consumer law, franchise business law, certified mediator law, visit selling law, guardian law, insurance law, stipulation law, electronic commerce consumer protection law, and installment law. This study is based on the analyzation and focuses on the characteristics and basis of the obligation of the provision of information when consumer contracts take place, and the items regarding the cancellation of the contract when there is a violation of the obligation and the problem of compensation, and the problems of current legal system are figured out, and as a means of interpretation of the law, the legal principles are reorganized and legislation theory is suggested.
The contents of this study are as follows. Article 1 is the introduction of the objective of this study and scope and method of this study. article 2, concerns the obligatory provision of information when consumer contracts take place, the legislation cases of Germany, France, USA and England, and Japan are figured out, and the comparison between the cases has been carried out. In article 3, the current domestic system of the obligatory provision of information when comsumer contracts take place is figured out. And the main subjects are the meaning and characteristics of consumer contracts, meaning and legal characteristics of the obligatory provision of information, types of obligatory provision of information, basis of the obligatory provision of information and legal effect when there is an obligatory violation. In article 4, the overall problems of legal theories of the obligatory provision of information when consumer contracts take place are figured out. In article 5, based on the problems which are suggested in article 4, the legal theories of the obligatory provision of information when comsumer contracts take place are reorganized, and the legislation theories are suggested. In article 6, as the conclusion of this study, the interpretation and legislation theories regarding the obligatory provision of information when comsumer contracts take place are summarized.
The summary of interpretation and legislation theory which is presented in this study as the reorganization of the legal theory of the obligatory provision of information are as follows.
First, it's the problem of the composition of theories of the legal characteristics of the obligatory provision of information. Current academic theories usually point out that when the provision of information is not designated as the obligation of the contract, the obligatory provision of information should be regarded as the subordinary obligation of good faith principle, or as the cautionary obligation of the contract, and that from the previous steps before the contract, the obligation should be recognized. However, in article 3 of part 19 of consumer law, at the special law regarding individual consumers, the obligatory provision of information is designated, so the opinion that the obligation is only the subordinary obligation according to good faith principle is not right. Considering that the current regulations according to the consumer law have only the effect of proclamation, according to the types, the obligation can be considered as an obligation or subordinary obligation, but when the obligation is designated in the special law regarding the consumer contracts, the obligation should be considered an obligation, and when the consumer contracts which are not applied under special law, based on the designation of the obligation of provision of information, the obligation should be considered an obligation.
Second, concerning the basis of obligatory provision of information, although there are consumer law and individual special laws, academic theories pursue the solution to the violation of the obligation based on fraud theory, misunderstanding theory, and negligence theory in the contracts, and in this study, to solve that, ① the effect of obligatory provision of information in consumer law should be reinforced, and ② the obligatory provision of information in the special laws regarding consumers should be typified, and the basis of the obligation should be found out in the consumer law or special laws regarding consumer contracts. In this study, it is pointed out that current consumer law part 19 article 3 is not obvious in the aspect of legal characteristic, and it can be condemned as a typical article, so a legislation theory, the obligatory provision of information in consumer law should be suggested more specifically and obviously. That is, the obligation should not exist as one article as article 19 of 'the obligation of businessmen', but should be detached as an individual article, and consumer's cancellation of the contract, compensation request right, and other punishment regulations should be designated all together and specifically.
Third, it is suggested that regarding the elements of the obligation, the elements should be designated at the part of the obligation of provision of information in consumer law. In our civil law, there is no regulation regarding the obligation in the consumer contracts, although the obligation is designated in consumer law, but it has no real power, and concerning special laws in consumer contracts, the provisions of the obligation are not specific and typical, so regarding the elements of the obligation, we are depending on academic theories. In this study, it is argued that the elements or determining criteria should be suggested not by academic theories, but by making the provisions of the obligation in the consumer law more specific, and through the interpretation of the law article.
Fourth, it is argued that the theory regarding legal effect when the obligation is violated should be reorganized. Regarding the legal effect of the violation of the obligation, in civil law and consumer law, there is no related provision, and in the special laws which are the subjects of the analyzation in this study, regarding the cancellation of contracts, several special laws recognize the cancellation right, but regarding compensation, there is no regulation, so currently, academic theories are organizing the obligation through misunderstanding and fraud theory regarding cancellation of contracts, and concerning compensation, they are organizing the obligation through the responsibility of failing to pay back the debt in article 390, the responsibility of illegal acts in article 750, or the responsibility of negligence in contracts.
It is argued that as the legislation theory regarding cancellation of contracts, article 19 in the regulation regarding the obligation of provision of information in consumer law should be revised, and in specific circumstances, the cancellation should be permitted. And it is argued that like article 45 in visit selling law and article 43 in installment selling law, the regulation of "The items which do not coincide with the regulation of the obligation of provision of information do not have any effect if the items make consumers inferior" should be designated directly.
And it is argued that as the legislation theory regarding compensation, as the violation effect of the obligation of provision of information of businessmen in consumer law, like the regulations regarding cancellation of contracts, the regulations regarding compensation should be designated in the same article. And it is argued that in the regulation of responsibility of businessmen of part 19 article 5 in consumer law, "Businessmen should solve or compensate consumers' complaints or damage caused by defects of items, and the damage of consumers caused by failing to pay back the debt should be compensated" is stipulated, and the meaning of the stipulation should be enlarged, and the regualtion of compensation should be applied to the case of violation of the obligation of provision of information in the same part article 3. In addition, concerning compensation, contract responsibility(civil law part 390) or illegal act responsibility(civil law part 750) are used as element of theories, it is argued that when theories are organized by illegal act responsibility, consumers must prove the intention or negligence or causal relationship of businessmen, and there is no possibility of compensation, so the proving responsibility should be converted or relieved and consumer right should be protected.
This study tried to systematically reorganize legal theories based on the problems regarding legal theories which are created by judicial precedents that businessmen have the obligatory provision of information, and when the violation of the obligation occurs, businessmen should compensate the damage toward consumers. And in the future, the regulations regarding the obligation of provision of information in consumer law should be made more specific, and the regulations should be sufficient to be recognized as the legal theories regarding the obligation of provision of information, and concerning the contents and determining criteria of the obligation, it should be made more typical and systematic.
Author(s)
정영진
Issued Date
2011
Awarded Date
2012. 2
Type
Dissertation
URI
http://dcoll.jejunu.ac.kr/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000005801
Alternative Author(s)
Jung, Young Jin
Affiliation
제주대학교
Department
대학원 법학과
Advisor
김상찬
Table Of Contents
제1장 서론 1
제1절 연구의 목적 1
제2절 연구의 범위와 방법 3
제2장 정보제공의무에 관한 주요국가의 입법례 6
제1절 독일 6
1. 법규정 7
2. 인정근거 8
(1) 특별규정에 의한 정보제공의무 8
(2) 특별법상의 정보제공의무 10
(3) 정보제공의무 위반의 효과 10
3. 법률효과 12
(1) 계약의 해소 12
(2) 계약의 조정 18
(3) 정보제공의무의 경합과 제한 19
제2절 프랑스 21
1. 법규정 22
(1) 일반적 의무로서의 명시의무 22
(2) 유사개념과의 구별 22
2. 인정근거 25
(1) 법적 근거 25
(2) 이론적 근거 26
3. 법률효과 30
(1) 손해배상책임 30
(2) 계약의 해제 31
제3절 영미법 32
1. 법규정 33
2. 인정근거 36
(1) 법적 근거 36
(2) 이론적 근거 37
3. 법률효과 39
(1) 부당이득의 반환 39
(2) 부실표시의 효력 40
(3) 특별한 약속과 예비적 합의 위반의 효력 41
제4절 일본 44
1. 법규정 45
2. 인정근거 47
(1) 법적 근거 47
(2) 이론적 근거 50
3. 법률효과 54
(1) 계약체결상 과실론의 활용 54
(2) 의사에 기하지 않은 부수의무위반으로서의 계약체결상의 과실론 55
(3) 정보환경정비책임론 56
(4) 정보격차시정의무론과 자기결정기반정비의무론 57
제5절 정리 및 시사점 58
제3장 우리나라의 소비자계약상 정보제공의무의 법리 63
제1절 소비자계약의 의의와 특성 63
1. 소비자계약의 의의 64
2. 소비자계약의 특성 66
(1) 당사자의 범위 66
(2) 당사자의 비대칭성 68
(3) 약관에 의한 계약 69
(4) 변형계약(비전형계약)부합계약 70
제2절 정보제공의무의 개념과 법적 성격 71
1. 의의 71
(1) 고지의무설명의무와의 관계 73
(2) 경고의무조언의무와의 관계 75
2. 법적 성격 76
3. 특징과 기능 78
(1) 특징 78
(2) 기능 79
제3절 소비자계약상 정보제공의무의 유형 80
1. 계약체결 전의 정보제공의무 80
(1) 계약체결 이전단계의 정보제공의 필요성 80
(2) 현행법상 관련 규정과 논의현황 81
2. 계약체결단계의 정보제공의무 83
(1) 계약체결단계의 정보제공의무의 의의 83
(2) 계약체결단계의 정보제공의무의 필요성 84
(3) 현행법상 관련 규정과 논의현황 84
제4절 정보제공의무의 인정근거와 그 위반의 효과 86
1. 법적 근거 87
(1) 소비자기본법 88
(2) 기타 특별법상 인정근거 89
2. 이론적 근거 111
(1) 사기법리의 적용 112
(2) 착오법리의 적용 115
(3) 신의칙법리의 적용 117
3. 정보제공의무의 판단기준과 범위 119
(1) 발생(판단)기준 119
(2) 범위와 강도 122
4. 정보제공의무 위반의 법률효과 122
(1) 계약의 해소 123
(2) 손해배상 127
제5절 소결 131
제4장 소비자계약상 정보제공의무의 법리상 문제점 133
제1절 정보제공의무의 발생요건 및 인정근거상의 문제점 133
1. 발생요건상의 문제점 133
2. 소비자기본법상 인정근거와 관련된 문제점 134
3. 기타 특별법상의 인정근거와 관련된 문제점 137
(1) 개별 특별법의 인정근거 규정 검토 137
(2) 논의의 정리 154
4. 민법규정의 적용상 불명확성 156
제2절 정보제공의무 위반의 효과상 문제점 158
1. 계약의 해소 159
(1) 소비자기본법상 계약해소 규정의 부존재 159
(2) 기타 특별법상 계약해소에 관한 규정의 존재여부 160
(3) 민법상 착오법리 및 사기법리 적용의 문제점 164
(4) 정보제공의무 위반을 이유로 한 계약해제권 인정여부 166
2. 손해배상 167
(1) 계약책임과 손해배상 167
(2) 불법행위책임과 손해배상 169
(3) 계약체결상의 과실책임과 손해배상 171
제5장 정보제공의무의 법리적 재구성 및 입법론 174
제1절 정보제공의무의 발생요건 및 실효성 확보 174
1. 정보제공의무의 발생요건 174
(1) 소비자기본법상 정보제공의무의 발생요건 명문화 174
(2) 소비자계약 관련 특별법상의 발생요건 175
2. 소비자기본법상 정보제공의무의 실효성 확보 175
(1) 소비자기본법의 정보제공의무 규정 강화 175
(2) 소비자단체의 역할강화와 소비자간의 네트워킹 177
3. 개별 특별법상의 정보제공의무규정의 정형화 179
(1) 정형화의 필요성 179
(2) 개별 특별법의 개정방향 180
4. 정보제공의무규정의 민법에의 편입여부 203
제2절 정보제공의무 위반의 법률효과 204
1. 계약의 해소 205
(1) 입법론 205
(2) 해석론 206
2. 손해배상 207
(1) 입법론 207
(2) 해석론 208
3. 입증책임의 문제 210
제3절 입법론 212
1. 소비자기본법의 개정방향 213
2. 개별 특별법의 개정방향 213
제6장 결론 217
참고문헌 222
Degree
Doctor
Publisher
제주대학교 대학원
Citation
정영진. (2011). 소비자계약상의 정보제공의무에 관한 연구
Appears in Collections:
General Graduate School > Law
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
파일 목록

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.