제주대학교 Repository

Hybrid Energy Optimization Algorithms Based on Energy Consumption Prediction in IoT Environment

Metadata Downloads
Abstract
Intelligent optimized energy management and prediction model in residential buildings
received attraction of the researchers in last couple of years. Various techniques and models
have been proposed in the literature for optimized energy management and prediction, but the
trade-off between occupant comfort index and energy consumption is still a great challenge to
the research community. Previously we have proposed power consumption optimization and
prediction models based on particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algorithm (GA).
Our proposed models accomplished good performance results up to some extent, but still
there is room for more improvements. In this thesis we proposed hybrid optimization of
energy management and power control models based on preprocessing mechanisms for
occupants comfort index, energy saving and energy consumption. The focus of our proposed
hybrid optimized and prediction models is to increase occupant's comfort index and reduce
energy consumption using hybrid optimization, power prediction and preprocessing of power
consumption data. The proposed single and multi-preprocessing hybrid optimization based
power control models provides energy efficient environment by reducing power consumption
and improving occupant's comfort index as compared to GA and PSO based power prediction
models.
Our proposed hybrid energy optimization based prediction models are simple and
maintains better user's comfort index and minimized the energy consumption without
compromising the occupants comfort index. User set parameters plays a vital role in deciding
the occupants comfort index. In [23, 26-30], user is not involved to determine the occupants comfort index, while our proposed models consider user set parameters to decide the
occupants comfort index. So our proposed models are user friendly. In [23, 31, 32], the energy
efficiency is not addressed, while our proposed models gives attention to energy savings and
our models are energy efficient by reducing energy consumption. In [29, 30], the occupants
comfort index is not considered while our proposed approach addressed occupants comfort
index. So the bottom line is, our proposed hybrid energy optimized models based on
prediction and preprocessing addressed energy efficiency, occupants comfort index and user
set parameters, while other approaches mentioned above either provides energy efficiency or
occupants comfort index without considering user set parameters.
Author(s)
Safdar Ali
Issued Date
2015
Awarded Date
2016. 2
Type
Dissertation
URI
http://dcoll.jejunu.ac.kr/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000007483
Alternative Author(s)
사프달 알리
Department
대학원 컴퓨터공학과
Table Of Contents
1. Introduction . 1
1.1. Research background 1
1.1.1. What is Energy management system (EMS) . 1
1.1.2. Why we need energy efficient system . 2
1.2. Proposed idea 2
1.2.1 Conceptual model. 4
1.2.2. Building model 5
1.2.3. Sensor data. 7
1.2.4. Single preprocessing 7
1.2.5. Multi-preprocessing. 7
1.2.6. Comfort index 8
1.2.7. Hybrid energy optimization. 10
1.2.7.1. Hierarchy of energy optimization and prediction algorithms. 14
1.2.7.2. Algorithms complexity . 19
1.2.7.3. Proposed hybrid energy optimization algorithms. 26
1.2.7.4. Which approach is good in which situation 29
1.2.8. Energy consumption predictions . 30
1.2.9. Actuators 31
1.2.10. Indoor environment . 31
1.3. Contributions 32
2. Related works 34
2.1. Energy consumption optimization 34
2.1.1. Optimization 34
2.1.2. Energy optimization 35
2.1.3. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) . 36
2.1.4. Genetic algorithm (GA). 37
2.1.5. Multi-Island genetic algorithm (MIGA) 39
2.2. Energy consumption control. 41
2.2.1. Fuzzy logic control 44
2.3. Energy consumption prediction 49
2.3.1. Kalman filter 51
2.3.2. ARIMA model . 53
2.4. Coordinator agent . 54
2.5. Preprocessing 55
2.6. Post-processing. 55
3. Proposed hybrid energy optimization algorithms based on prediction in IoT environment 56
3.1. Basic energy optimization model based on prediction . 56
3.1.1. Genetic algorithm based energy optimization prediction 56
3.1.1.1. Proposed architecture . 56
3.1.1.2. Optimization algorithm using GA 57
3.1.2. Particle swarm optimization based energy optimization prediction 58
3.1.2.1. Proposed architecture . 58
3.1.2.2. Optimization algorithm using PSO. 60
3.2. Hybrid energy optimization model based on prediction. 62
3.2.1. Single preprocessing hybrid optimization model based on prediction 62
3.2.1.1. Hybrid energy optimization and predicted power control model . 62
3.2.1.1.1. Proposed architecture 62
3.2.1.1.2. Optimization algorithm based on PSO and GA parallel 63
3.2.1.2. A hybrid approach to optimization of energy and power control prediction. 65
3.2.1.2.1. Proposed architecture 65
3.2.1.2.2. Optimization algorithm based on PSO and GA serial . 66
3.2.1.3. Hybrid optimization energy management and predicted power control model . 69
3.2.1.3.1. Proposed architecture 69
3.2.1.3.2. Optimization algorithm based on PSO and MIGA serial 70
3.2.2. Multi-preprocessing hybrid optimization model based on prediction. 73
3.2.2.1. Energy efficient hybrid optimization and predicted power control model . 73
3.2.2.1.1. Proposed architecture 73
3.2.2.1.2. Optimization algorithm based on PSO and GA parallel 75
3.2.2.2. Energy efficient hybrid optimization and power control prediction model . 77
3.2.2.2.1. Proposed architecture 77
3.2.2.2.2. Optimization algorithm based on PSO and GA serial . 79
3.2.2.3. Hybrid Energy Optimization and Prediction Based on PSO and MIGA Serial 81
3.2.2.3.1. Proposed architecture 81
3.2.2.3.2. Optimization algorithm based on PSO and MIGA serial 83
4. Simulation and analysis. 86
4.1. Single preprocessing hybrid optimization model based on prediction. 86
4.1.1. Optimization algorithm based on PSO and GA parallel 86
4.1.1.1. Simulation environment . 86
4.1.1.2. Simulation analysis. 93
4.1.1.2.1. Virtual environment . 93
4.1.1.2.2. Optimization 95
4.1.1.2.3. Control messages. 97
4.1.1.2.4. Actuator emulators. 101
4.1.2. Optimization algorithm based on PSO and GA serial . 103
4.1.2.1. Simulation environment . 103
4.1.2.2. Simulation analysis. 103
4.1.2.2.1. Virtual environment . 103
4.2.1.2.2. Optimization 103
4.2.1.2.3. Control messages. 106
4.2.1.2.4. Actuator emulators. 109
4.1.3. Optimization algorithm based on PSO and MIGA serial . 110
4.1.3.1. Simulation environment 110
4.1.3.2. Simulation analysis 110
4.1.3.2.1. Virtual environment 110
4.1.3.2.2. Optimization . 111
4.1.3.2.3. Control messages 113
4.1.3.2.4. Actuator emulators 117
4.2. Multi-preprocessing hybrid optimization model based on prediction . 118
4.2.1. Optimization algorithm based on PSO and GA parallel. 118
4.2.1.1. Simulation environment 118
4.2.1.2. Simulation analysis 118
4.2.1.2.1. Virtual environment 118
4.2.1.2.2. Optimization . 118
4.2.1.2.3. Control messages. 121
4.2.1.2.4. Actuator emulators. 124
4.2.2. Optimization algorithm based on PSO and GA serial . 125
4.2.2.1. Simulation environment . 125
4.2.2.2. Simulation analysis. 125
4.2.2.2.1. Virtual environment . 125
4.2.2.2.2. Optimization 126
4.2.2.2.3. Control messages. 128
4.2.2.2.4. Actuator emulators. 131
4.2.3. Optimization algorithm based on PSO and MIGA serial 132
4.2.3.1. Simulation environment . 132
4.2.3.2. Simulation analysis. 132
4.2.3.2.1. Virtual environment . 132
4.2.3.2.2. Optimization 133
4.2.3.2.3. Control messages. 135
4.2.3.2.4. Actuator emulators. 138
5. Performance comparisons and analysis. 140
5.1. Basic energy optimization model based on prediction . 140
5.1.1. Optimized power control methodology using GA and PSO 140
5.1.1.1. Comparisons of power consumption prediction results 140
5.1.1.2. Comparisons of occupants comfort index results. 142
5.2. Hybrid energy optimization model based on prediction. 145
5.2.1. Single preprocessing hybrid optimization model based on prediction 145
5.2.1.1. Optimization algorithm based on PSO and GA parallel. 145
5.2.1.1.1. Comparisons of power consumption prediction results. 145
5.2.1.1.2. Comparisons of occupants comfort index results 148
5.2.1.2. Optimization algorithm based on PSO and GA serial 149
5.2.1.2.1. Comparisons of power consumption prediction results. 149
5.2.1.2.2. Comparisons of occupants comfort index results 152
5.2.1.3. Optimization algorithm based on PSO and MIGA serial . 153
5.2.1.3.1. Comparisons of power consumption prediction results. 153
5.2.1.3.2. Comparisons of occupants comfort index results 156
5.2.2. Multi-preprocessing hybrid optimization model based on prediction. 157
5.2.2.1. Optimization algorithm based on PSO and GA parallel. 157
5.2.2.1.1. Comparisons of power consumption prediction results. 157
5.2.2.1.2. Comparisons of occupants comfort index results 162
5.2.2.2. Optimization algorithm based on PSO and GA serial 164
5.2.2.2.1. Comparisons of power consumption prediction results. 164
5.2.2.2.2. Comparisons of occupants comfort index results 169
5.2.2.3. Optimization algorithm based on PSO and MIGA serial . 171
5.2.2.3.1. Comparisons of power consumption prediction results. 171
5.2.2.3.2. Comparisons of occupants comfort index results 176
6. Conclusions . 180
References . 182
Degree
Doctor
Publisher
제주대학교 대학원
Citation
Safdar Ali. (2015). Hybrid Energy Optimization Algorithms Based on Energy Consumption Prediction in IoT Environment
Appears in Collections:
General Graduate School > Computer Engineering
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
파일 목록

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.